created: 2021-12-28T12:36:30 (UTC +01:00) tags: [twitter,twitter thread,unroll,threadreader,threads] source: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1474586679646195712.html author:

Thread by @syncretizm on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App

Excerpt

Thread by @syncretizm: The problem with outliners: Parent - A - B When we want a sequential chain of thought, we nest them as equal level children under the same parent. The alternative would be a very……


The problem with outliners:

Parent
- A
- B

When we want a sequential chain of thought, we nest them as equal level children under the same parent. The alternative would be a very ugly way:

Parent
- A
- B
- C
- …

This way makes more sense but looks horrible.

The maths doesn’t work out either. When use method 1, A/B/C are related via an OR (x) function. In method 2, A/B/C are related via an AND (%) function. We intuitively feel this burden that something is not right. And yet we don’t like going into indenting hell.

Part of the reason why I enjoyed writing in prose form in obsidian was because I didn’t have to figure out whether I had to indent or write a sibling bullet. Isn’t it intuitive? No it isn’t, especially when you consider how a bullet is queried in future…

In outliners, querying for a thought doesn’t show you a linear progression of thought. It shows you the parent-child relationship, discarding its siblings. The problem is that a thought is multidimensional, whereas an outline only has parent-child… FHbOJtiVkAQXMcw.jpg

Axes of thought. An outliner only adequately shows the hierarchy axis, it is 1 dimensional. It also forces the progression axis to work in a parent-child relationship when it doesn’t work that way. FHbR1fDUcAQDWeY.jpg

A promising approach in @obsdmd using the breadcrumbs plugin… This could work… VERY well. FHba1oKVgAAX220.jpg

@mentions@obsdmd I’m getting more convinced that outliners are inferior to original Zettelkasten (using cards). Zettelkasten was essentially and originally a thread system made on paper.


Linked from: